Blog Critiques

My first blog critique is Michael Harrison. I like how he was short and sweet with this one and that is how he is with most of his blogs. Not much wasted space and very to the point. Many people write around the topic, but not his. In “The Global Economy” he gave a very well thought out answer without writing an extensive book.

My next blog is Max on “Vietnam War Aftermath- America”. This was another blog that was not extensive, but very to the point. The content was good in this blog, however I did not see any links in it. I’m not sure if they needed the links for that specific blog, but I am just assuming they did. For this reason, I will give Maximillion a 95%.

Janelle is next and she blogged on the “Last Supper”. This may sound harsh, but maybe she had to be somewhere before she wrote this blog. I say that because of the minimal effort (at best) that was put into this blog. Not to be mean, but I read the blog and did not come away with any new information like I have with the other blogs. I would recommend a little more effort next time. This piece of work gets a 63% in my book.

Andrew Patag blogged on “Roman Architecture”. This blog was informative, but I thought a little more effort would have enhanced the blog and the grade. I would give this blog a B-, but more effort would result in an A- in my book.

The last blog is Kelsey Verburg and she wrote on “Christianity in Rome”. The main thing that stuck out to me was spelling and grammatical errors in general. Sadly, this part gave the blog a negative feel for the rest of the blog. Past the spelling and grammatical errors, the blog had good content and ideas. I would highly recommend using spell check and proof reading it before posting the blog.